Training Needs Assessment Using the Scaled Comparison
The Scaled Comparison uses the following format to compare job-related skills and activities:
| Question:
|
Which skill is more important in the job of Supervisor?
|
| Dealing with ambiguity and change
|
|
Developing groups into effective teams
|
|
|
Each respondent is presented with many decisions like this. On
one page, each skill is compared with each other skill in many
different ways. As many as 40 to 60 skills can be assessed.
Traditional training needs surveys ask "What skills would you
like more training in?" or simply try to identify the most
important skills, and train them.
The Scaled Comparison approaches the assessment of training
needs from 3 perspectives. The first question asks about the importance of the skills for a
particular job or family of jobs:
| Question:
|
Which skill is more important in the job of Supervisor?
|
|
|
On the second page, the process repeats itself with a different
question. It can never be assumed that the most important skills
are always the skills most in need of training. Indeed, in
organizations with ongoing and extensive training, the most
important skills may be less in need of training than
others.
So the second question asks, about the same list of skills,
which is in greater need of training:
| Question:
|
In which skill do Supervisors need more training?
|
|
|
It would be nice if we only had to look at those two questions
to determine the content of our training programs.
Unfortunately, we have all seen excellent programs developed to
train very important skills, only to witness the organization
"wash out" the new skills when the people return to their jobs. The fact is that many organizations authorize the training of
skills, but do nothing to prepare the workplace for the new
abilities. They have old norms, or even formal procedures that
extinguish the new skills almost immediately.
So the third question tries to learn whether the skill is likely to be rewarded in the job. Training alone has never been an effective organizational change
strategy. So training programs for skills that will go
unrewarded or even punished should probably be delayed until
some good organizational development efforts have prepared the
workplace.
| Question:
|
For which skill is a Supervisor more likely to be rewarded?
|
|
|
What do the results look like?
The Scaled Comparison produces four different reports that
illustrate and summarize the way the respondents view the
training needs of the job being studied.
The Gap Analysis shows the results of the three questions for each
skill assessed. Skills that are high in importance, training
need, and reward are the top candidates for training
programs.
|
|
|
|
The High / Low Matrix presents the same data in a slightly
different format. In the example shown, you can identify skills
high in both importance and need for training, as well as skills
that may be high in one but not the other. Separate reports
show the relationships with the reward question.
|
|
|
How do I get more information?
|
|